DIR's Office of the Director-Legal Unit. 1st Class losers and 3rd Rate lawyers (definitely not ready for the private sector)
Well, the morons at OD-Legal are wasting taxpayers funds yet again. Chief homewrecker Counsel Vanessa Holton, Asst. Chief Counsel Steve McGinty, and Flunkie Richard Munoz are crying about the judge's proposed decision. These morons still don't understand the 1st Amendment. They have an endless bank account because it's the taxpayers that are footing the bill! Can you imagine if Vanessa Holton had to personally tap Lloyd Aubrey's bank account to fund this witch-hunt? Why aren't these morons doing the job that they are paid to do, which is to lose in front of state Adminstrative Law Judges? Oh wait, we don't have the decision on Miles' fate just yet, but it's coming. Why is the Office of the Director-Legal Unit fighting some dipshit blogger? Why is so much money being thrown at all of these OD-Legal morons, authorized to continue this losing battle? Which #1 moron is authorizing OD-Legal to continue this battle? Is it our top secretary, Victoria Bradshaw? Is it that other moron Robert Jones (who can't read meal & rest periods), or is it someone else? OD-Legal cannot shit in the woods without an instruction manual, so who is pulling their strings? In any event, every time those morons file a court document is just another opportunity for them to get beat. It's too bad that the judge cannot fine them for wasting the court's time and wasting the taxpayer's money for such intentional & consistent losses. Unfortunately for Vanessa Holton, this is not (any sort of) a husband stealing contest; it's a 1st Amendment issue. These jackasses don't care if they continuing losing, because the financial fraud, waste, and abuse is committed upon the taxpayer; not one DIR turd is telling them to halt and to cut their losses, because they have no losses; it's the taxpayer's loss.
I'm not sure if Vanessa Holton took any recent legal ethics classes, but is there any ethical connection to harassing a blogger exercising free speech, unrelated to DLSE's mission and stealing someone else's husband? I'm not really sure, so please have Vanessa click the 'comment' button and pontificate about this possible nexus. Typically, it's been my experience that an asshole at work is an asshole at home, but I'd really need a video camera at Greg Rupp's house to solidify my theory. Having Vanessa Holton as OD-Legal's Chief Counsel is like having Alberto Gonzales as our Attorney General....oh wait.
Labels: 1st Amendment, McGinty, Munoz, Rupp, Taxpayers, Vanessa Holton
1 Comments:
******************************************************************##################################################################
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Mr., Blogman, if McGinty, Munoz and Vanessa Holton were really smart it might have cost you a lot more in legal fees to have beat them in Superior Court. There is nothing like beating smart alecks in a court of law, and now they are giving you a chance of further enjoyment. Plus the fact if you were not using up their time they might be screwing up something of real importance. These are probably the same guys that defended Bradstreet in Corrales vs. Bradstreet. What if the commissioner had have hired real attorneys to handle that case. Some body with intelligence might have actually won it. These guys are bureaucrats because they couldn't make in the real world of law. You know you are right and you know they are wrong. How many people in this world actually have the opportunity to prevail over the dark side? Count your blessings and be thankful for people like Rupp, Calva and Almaraz. They make you look good.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home