DLSE should not be abusive in its power

State government, specifically the DLSE, shouldn't be about putting Miles Locker on paid administrative leave so they can drum up a case against him and subsequently terminate him. How chickensh*t is that? Boy, do I hope that Miles Locker will bring this huge billboard of a timeline chart where he can show the times & dates of who did what to whom. I hope he's able to establish, in his upcoming State Personnel Board appeal, what a vindictive joke this agency is.

When I say joke, I mean that the DLSE should be spending their time, resources and personnel on serving the People of California instead of wasting such time, resources, and personnel on ex-communicating employees they dislike. That, more than anything, sounds like a Fraud, Waste, and Abuse complaint that might ultimately be filed with the Bureau of State Audits. The DLSE is not a playground for vendettas. In their typical pattern of delay, delay, delay, the DLSE has already lost employees Donna Dell and Jose Millan, two figures potentially critical to Mr. Lockers' appeal. I wonder how many other DLSE staff will be gone by the time the dust settles?

What's typical in this agency is that timeliness is a foreign word to DLSE leaders unless it suits them. If it doesn't suit their interest, then they give new meaning to the phrase "foot-dragging," and then they leave the problem(s) for someone else to fix.