Wednesday, November 04, 2009

The latest, but it may be dated....

So the morons at DLSE: Jorge Gomez, Angie Badstreet, and Abby Calva are not gonna be having fun in about a year and a half. If they keep hoping that I'll get hit by a bus or a car & thus avoid losing litigation, then they might want to think about settling and giving me my job back, because I will be coming back since those 'tards cannot & will not have the authority to settle this, especially given California's financial 'tardation.
Congrats to Susanita Parker for having the largest caseload in the shortest amount of time while employed as a DLC I! This will come back to bite Jorge Gomez in the ass during his deposition as well as Abby Calva because they're constantly looking at the monthly stats! I cannot wait for jorge to be all-nervous and then pretend memory loss! You know what they say...moron at deposition, moron at trial!
I have heard that Kimchi Vu is nothing more than a Hearing Scheduler and her conferences are bullsh*t. In light of the furlogh, she spends half of her time on the 4th floor where her only Vietnamese friends hang, Jorge knows she disappears and does nothing. All Kim does is set her stuff to hearing, and she has all three hearing Officers working for her. Exactly, what the hell is California paying her for, since she does not settle wage claims? How much should the taxpayer pay for some desk jockey to process paperwork that my blind monkey can process? Moving on....
DLSE tells one of their Hearing Officers to reduce the 1,000+ hours of accrued vacation in some systematic plan, only to rescind the order because that actually means that the hearing Officer will be gone for hundreds of hours....hand to God, these morons could not find their butthole with a funnel.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

The order, GIOYD-get it off your desk.

11/05/2009 9:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

DLSE management is a band of fools!!

11/06/2009 5:03 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

fools smarter

11/06/2009 9:01 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I found this site using [url=][/url] And i want to thank you for your work. You have done really very good site. Great work, great site! Thank you!

Sorry for offtopic

11/07/2009 10:06 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

CL come back DLSE. Sure, must be dreaming.

11/08/2009 7:04 AM  
Anonymous Not anonymous! said...

Has anyone else noticed that certain anonymous posters (like the on 11/8/09 @ 7:04) have horrible grammar? ('CL come back DLSE. Sure, must be dreaming.') Or, are they are trying to write blog haiku?

Ultimately, CL will come back to the DLSE, or chose not to because of the large civil settlement he will win. This department has abused the rights of their employees over and over again, and for this they will be held accountable and forced to pay. He already won once against them in Superior Court, and will prevail again.

11/08/2009 10:24 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

who care grammar, you get idea.

11/08/2009 6:32 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

CL no come back. CL too efficient for DLSE, they want state employee zombie like Kimchi Vu who shuffle paper and make no trouble. If someone complain on Kimchi Vu, George Gomez and Calva sweep it under rug. Big rug.

11/09/2009 9:57 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

VH's so pissed off that OLGA GARAU's to be reinstated, so go CL, YOU CAN DO IT! DIR/DLSE are so good at protecting their own inept desk jockeys who'd kiss each other's asses, it sure stink to highway heaven through AB/VH, yuk!! WHAT A PAIR OF SKANKY DIKES AT THE HELM, EH?

11/10/2009 11:45 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm sure that the blogger has criminal behavior and that the DLSE arrested the blogger for such heinous acts!

These butt-monkeys have been watching him under the microscope since 2004 and the worst thing they have on the blogger is that he blogs!

So accuse all you want, make stuff up and try to besmirch the blogger. Olga Garau won because she was in the right and DLSE was in the wrong.

The Blogger won his first trial in SUPERIOR court (that means its more superior than the SPB that protects the DLSE) because the blogger was right and the DLSE was wrong, and the blogger will win his FOUR (count 'em - 4) court actions because the DLSE is fundamentally wrong, broken, and illegal in their actions.

PS: CL doesn't deny hearings...check the DLSE Wage Claim Policy & Procedure manual on the website

11/11/2009 8:12 AM  

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home