Thursday, September 24, 2009

Did DLSE Supervisor Jorge Gomez tell attorney that a wage claim case was more important than a Superior Court appearance?

I gotta hand it to Jorge Gomez, he has consistently remained stupid for 50+ years. Normally, people this dumb walk in front of buses, stick forks in electrical outlets, or try to load a DVD player while taking a bath.
So Monday, Sep. 21st, a lawyer has a concurrent wage claim and must appear in Superior Court. He asks Jorge Gomez to delay the wage claim, and Jorge Gomez tells him "No." Let me back up. That Hearing Officer in Santa Ana, Dumb-Bar, told the attorney that he had to put the request in writing...I never saw that in the Labor Code, but I digress. Gomez, once again, tries to be a baby shot-caller, and he keeps making the wrong call.
To make a long story short, the Orange County Superior Court told Gomez that he had better re-think his weak position (not exact quote), to which Gomez bent over and changed his mind. The attorney stayed in Superior Court and the wage claim was delayed...nothing new in Gomez's house, as he is very consistent in making the wrong decision.
I cannot wait for his upcoming deposition...cannot wait!

35 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

We are counting on you CL to win in court. If it were not for persons like you the taxpayers would lose a lot more money. We have got to stop the thieves like Jim Culbeaux and his sister Christine Baker from committing fraud and the taxpayers paying for it.

9/24/2009 5:52 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

That little bitch Jorge Gomez never stood up for his staff. It took this blog to report on Vicky Tamoush's bitch-cry to HQ for Robert Jones to begin his bureaucratic shuffle. Then, Assembly Member Van Tran sends a letter to Angela Badstreet, and she dances that same bullshit that Jones danced. I'd say that he taught her that dance, but she's a carpet muncher.

9/24/2009 10:19 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Those little bitches are alleging that the blogger made bad decisions and that's why he was fired, but how many bad decisions have Jorge Gomez and Abby Calva made?

Nothing happened to them, but I'm sure that blogger's lawyer is gonna depose the crap outta Abby & Jorge and highlight their piss-poor decisions so they can be compared to the sniper attack they made on the blogger.

Jorge's wife has bigger junk up her skirt than Jorge has in his pants, but Abby's got bigger junk that her husband! What a sad, sad world the DLSE has become.

9/25/2009 3:13 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

JIM CULBEAUX IS A MASTER IN FRAUD. JIM GOT HIS JOB AT DIRt THROUGH FRAUD. HE CONTINUES TO DEFRAUD THE TAXPAYERS.

IF THAT MUSCLE-BRAIN SCHWARZNEGGER CONTINUES TO WELFARE BUMS LIKE CULBEAUX, THE STATE DEFICIT WILL EXPLODE WITH THE FRAUD CULBEAUX BRINGS TO THE JOB.

9/25/2009 9:44 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Guys,

Jim Culbeaux get kicbacks from the consultants for projects (CMS) and taxpayer get deficit.

9/30/2009 6:35 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The blogger is a disloyal piece of crap, whose entire life has been nothing but bad decisions. He deserves everything he got.

10/06/2009 6:46 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Blogger is an idiot! He is throwing money away fighting his termination. The DLSE has unlimited legal resources since their staff counsel is on the state's payroll so they will nickel and dime him to death. Even if he wins and gets his job back, is a $55k/yr job (less the 15% furlough cut) really worth it?

10/07/2009 3:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

If it were not for this blog, a lot of people could be killed at DIRt, considering how DIRt treats them.

Everyday I go to work fearing someone will be harmed because of the wrong DIRt is doing to them -- like they are doing to the blogger.

Suprised, I will not be, when something happens!!!

10/07/2009 6:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

DLSE, what a joke. U know I once worked for the DLSE a while ago and i can tell you first hand some of things i saw going on behind closed doors was horrible. I mean if i were a tax payer i would be writing Arnie asking him why we had to tell people it would take us 8 weeks until someone would get a letter in the mail regarding a date and time to talk to someone about recovering their owed wages. Or why it would take 6 to 8 months to get a hearing date to tell someone what i already told someone else. JUST RIDDICULOUS.

10/12/2009 10:55 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

JIM CULBEAUX AND HIS SISTER CONTINUE TO ROB AND DEFRAUD THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. HOW MUCH MORE CAN THE STATE TAKE BEFORE DECLARING BANKRUPTCY?

10/14/2009 11:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

look up GARAU's writ decision, let's go BLOGGER, 'cuz she just won her right to be rehired back! DIRty business continues w its slut, V.HOLTON, hiring husband-wife tag team of Roger Jeanson & his wife, Jean Jeanson, side-by-side nepotism at taxpayers' expense here, while she works from home, while claiming FSL (vac) at same time.

10/16/2009 12:11 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

VERDICT'S IN: 1ST ROUND: GARAU! [Look up, GARAU's 2nd app./div.4's case no. B210355/LASC BS113391]

10/16/2009 12:18 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who's Garua?

10/16/2009 7:23 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I can gurantee that the blogger will be hired back. Blogger was fired because he was whistleblowing a protected activity. Blogger has worked tirelessly for this State and should be given a couple of promotions for all the years and times Vanesa Holton has attempted to scare blogger and deliberately discriminate and harass him.

10/16/2009 11:04 PM  
Anonymous Chippy said...

It looks like Olga Garau was a DLSE atty that was rejected while on probation:

Dept. of Industrial Relations v. SPB / Olga Garau: The SPB has received a
petition for writ of mandate filed in the Los Angeles County Superior Court by
the Dept. of Industrial Relations challenging the Board’s decision that revoked
the rejection during probation served on Industrial Relations Counsel III
(Specialist) Olga Garau on the grounds that the notice was not served in the
manner authorized by law. The Legal Office has filed a Notice of Appearance
concerning the matter.

So I am guess the LASC #BS113391 was a writ filed by DLSE & they lost?

Not surprising, because as the blogger & his attorney know, the DLSE doesn't do well in a real court of law!!!

Please post more details about this case!!

10/17/2009 3:48 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/nonpub/B210335.PDF

This is a link to the Appellate Court's decision. Typical DIR tactics- they refuse to accept the SPB's decision to reinstate her!!

Remember when the blogger won his first amendment case & was ordered to pay his legal fees and DIRt stalled and stalled?? Good memories, good times!

10/17/2009 4:05 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jim Culbeaux is a thief, no matter where he goes he will rob and defraud.

10/19/2009 10:38 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Less work days but Management says do more, more, more. Bradstreet is the Octomom of managers.

10/22/2009 7:01 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jim Culbeaux laugh at u

10/28/2009 5:59 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Blog dead

10/29/2009 6:09 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Blog dead" is right. Blogger must be too busy doing nothing while being unemployed.

10/29/2009 6:43 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

JIM CULBEAUX IS A THIEF AND CONTINUES TO ROB THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA WITH HIS SISTER CHRISTINE.

10/29/2009 9:40 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

culbeaux post boring, get life

10/30/2009 9:02 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jim Culbeaux is thief we all know. He commit exam fraud. Why no go to jail? Deficit?

10/30/2009 11:55 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

no one care about Culbeaux

10/31/2009 8:23 AM  
Anonymous DIRt Gang said...

Me work for DIRt Manager Position, I no know english, manage big staff. Ann Rose and sister run DIRt, everybody gang rape each other like Richmond kids, no accountability, we are immune, very nice place to whore here. Want sue Dirt, call Richard Rogers, 415-397-1515 - He can screw family memebers at DIRt. email him at rogersmr@aol.com or http://www.mayoandrogers.com

Sue us if you can, or just shutup -come to woke and let us gange rape you, be happy, nice family woking here at dirt, we win all d tymes.

11/01/2009 11:08 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

no one care

11/01/2009 9:35 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Blog funny

11/02/2009 6:49 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jim Culbox is fraud-man.

11/02/2009 9:54 PM  
Anonymous heliocen@hotmail.com said...

In short this is my admitted “venting” to DLSE/DIR hypocrisy, where they have proven time and time again that they have no respect for any rational argument - in this case in regard to fundamental due process and the California Public Records Act. It is addressed to DIR Chief Deputy Director David Rowan. For a complete copy of my fax to this degenerate public clown, please email me at heliocen@hotmail.com: “In regard to my PRA requests and your conclusions that
somehow the hearing recording gaps have been explained;
how can we explain this 27 minute first afternoon
hearing record gap? DLSE Padres’ reasoning about this
stated that the disc recordings ran out of time with
the disc’s limitations and HO Murphy failed to change
to a new disc in time, correct? How can Padres and you
explain that the first morning recording is 80 minutes
long and the first afternoon recording stops abruptly
at 53 minutes? The 27 minute gap must also be the time
lapse between your active brain cells if you accept
such an unfounded conclusion as you tacitly have by not
addressing its absurdity. In fact you stated that it
was “plausible explanations for the discrepancies in
the hearing recordings”, which I interpret as your big
fat lie. What could have been the motivation by Padres’
wonderfully short-sighted theory? She wouldn’t just
make this leaky theory up and you accept it because you
both want to kiss the status quo’s big kahuna butt? We
must all admit that self-preservation is the law of the
jungle and must be the prime motivator of all the
denizens on the DLSE and DIR turf equally as I’ve
observed in scaling its hierarchy. I guess this is the
closest you’ll ever come to a democratic entity, acting
in unison as a herd species in blind, stupid agreement.
And in regard to these DLSE and DIR purposeful nonactions that are perniciously designed not to enforce the labor laws or observe due process while steadfastly refusing to weigh any evidence to the contrary, I’m reminded of the powerful metaphor in Orwell’s Animal Farm: “Four legs good, two legs bad”, where the pigs eventually act like their masters. Which in your case translates to the engine that was intended to protect laborers, now exploits them. This hypocrisy begets the worst kind of cronyism where everyone’s motive is fear of exposing this cynicism and a compulsion to watch out for everyone else’s butt at the expense of what was suppose to be a functioning, humane institution. If you don’t believe me take a look at the “DLSE/Dir(t)” graffiti that your own employees have desperately resorted to at http://nolaborstandards.blogspot.com.
In summary, I can understand the evolutionary process
behind say a dung beetle on dung patrol. At least his
efforts might benefit the dung beetle colony. While at
the DIR/DLSE the shit only mucks up the works for those
honest, hard-working Californians like me who have
sought justice at these state agencies. I, like many
others, have been ripped off by abysmally corrupt
imposters like you who pretend to uphold the labor laws
and maintain due process. The DLSE and DIR have proved
themselves a disgrace and should be confined to the
histories of the Third Reich, witch burnings and other
abhorrent anachronisms that have obstructed the path of
human progress.”

11/04/2009 9:36 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

True

11/05/2009 6:06 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

CAN SOMEONE START A CLASS-ACTION SUIT AGAINST THESE SKANKY DYKES (DIRty-VH; DLSE-2-easy-AB) FOR WHAT THEY'VE DONE TO ALL THE GOOD, HARD-WORKING CALIFORNIANS? WHERE'S THE LINE-UP? THESE UNCONSCIONABLE SLUTS NEED THEIR COMEUPPANCE TO MATCH THEIR INSIDE-OUT EVIL UGLINESS.

11/10/2009 11:56 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Eduardo, are you still taking money from private consultants?

1/11/2010 3:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Cheung and Nakagama, I trust the bloger's Title VII lawsuit will catch the US Attorney's attention if not already. May righteous justice be served. Chris, may you and Rosen pay particular attention to these violators and probe deep into their history at DLSE.

1/22/2010 2:15 AM  
Blogger Edward said...

If you or any other person that you know has suffered an injury due to an airplane accident, they should consult an airline attorney and get financial compensation for the loss suffered.

11/11/2010 3:55 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home