Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Blogger rec'd this from anonymous source...quoted below

"It has come to my attention that since a Hearing Officer in the Santa Ana office haas filed a grievance based on gender discrimination as well as filing a complaint with EEOC, he has ben harassed and retaliated against. The Department has now made a 35-year employee with a spotless record appear to be the worst employee ever hired. The retaliation is relentless in that he has now been issued warnings concerning attendance, lateness, and long lunch hours. Furthermore, every time he refuses to settle the matter with the Department he is further disciplined. The first time he refused to settle, he was issued an attendance warning, the second time he refused settlement he was given another disciplinary day off without pay. What is the union doing in trying to resolve these discriminatory and retaliatory acts. The answer is that they are trying to coerce the employee in accepting a settlement offer that favors the department rather than putting an end to these discriminatory acts. It is public knowledge that "CASE" has never won a grievance against this department and they will do anything to settle rather than going to a hearing or God help us, court."
Blogger's comment: let me address two issues,
1) the employee's union, CASE, has so much money and so little talent-it is embarrassing. For example, let's say that there are 400 DLC Is and DLC IIs paying $45/month in dues. CASE takes in $18,000 a month-just from the DLSE employees! $18,000 a month! Who the heck knows that they do with that money because CASE receives a lot of money from DLSE just to lose their grievances! CASE representative Monica Miner is a better breast-feeder than legal representative. She should go back to being a full-time mother because this way, only one human being is effed up under her watch instead of the DLSE employees that must suffer under her representation.
2) DLSE's history has been to intimidate with their lawyers and investigations until they get the desired result. All one needs to do is to take them to court, a real court, not their in-house Civil Rights Office (CRO) and certainly not the State Personnel Board (SPB). The CRO is there to protect the DLSE, to whitewash any management improprieties and the hammer any employee deemed undesirable. The SPB is here to protect the Governor's interest, which means that the DLSE must be protected. Since it was management that initiated these adverse actions against the employee, the SPB must now find a way to legally justify DLSE's incompetence, lack of policies & procedures, double standards, retaliation, and discrimination.
DLSE ambulance chaser Tony Mischel will probably win his SPB case against me, but I'm not going to stop will go to a Writ of Mandate in Superior Court, and if the SPB judge intentionally shows bias towards the DLSE, then the state bar can handle that complaint. I'll pit my attorney against Tony Mischel on any day of the week, even my attorney's worst day and Tony Mischel's best day. Tony's nothing unless he has home court advantage. Put Tony in a real courtroom and he's just another fat old man with a law degree, no talent and certainly nothing special-that's why he's a lowly hatchet-man for a 3rd-rate agency like the DLSE.
In a few years, his fat-encrusted heart will either seize up, he'll have a stroke from all that smoking, or maybe he's already a Type II Diabetic because of all those chocolates. In any event, his body fat content, the girth of his waist, his smoke-filled lungs only play to my favor. Tony Mischel is a lazy glutton, whether it's a cigarette, a sausage, or a caramel. He has no internal discipline, and that makes him the best kind of adversary: a lazy moron whose daily hell is getting out of bed and trying to fit into his own elastic pants. The sooner my attorney wins, the sooner I can laugh harder and louder.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

The employee should file a lawsuit in Federal Court.

I have seen that this is a pattern of harassment that is being used to silence discrimination complaints. The plaintiff should ask for all records pertaining to employees filing previous discrimination complaints. The plaintiff will discover the tardiness letters from DIRt sent to all these employees.

Also there is currently an attorney named Olga Garau that worked for DOSH and was fired and has asked DIRt for this kind of information.

5/20/2009 6:46 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm not surprised that DIRt stoops to this level of unprofessionalism.

Angela Bradstreet whored herself for the private sector as a pro-employer lawyer that squashed employees and now she's whoring for the public sector.

A piece of crap by any other name---

5/20/2009 7:30 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jorge Gomez is ready to have a sex change to appease Angela Bradstreet. He's got Big Boobs anyway so the operation will be easy.

5/20/2009 8:39 PM  
Anonymous KEN AND JOHN 640 AM said...

George, the spineless Senior Deputy in the Santa Ana office hands out Adverse Actions like a newspaper boy and then points his finger at upper management, not himself. This week alone he handed out(2)adverse actions and then called in sick the next day. But for sure he will return tomorrow for an investigative hearing of another deputy in which he states he has no knowledge and that the questions he has to ask the deputy are coming from headquarters. I believe we have seen this type of character at the Neurenberg trials after Hitler killed thousands of innocent bystanders. I can hear him now "I was just doing what management told me to do". Poor George has been around (4) women at home for such a long time that he has become one of the girls. Bradstreet, Denise and Abigail must be so proud of their little girley boy puppet in the Santa Ana Office. While Jorgy Boy plays the fiddle, the Santa Ana Office is burning. I hope everyone of the persecuted deputies and clerks file grievances, discrimination complaints and have a full blown job slowdown as well as the blue flu in order to bring down this corrupt establishment. No human being should have to work under constant duress and stress on a daily basis. It's time to say "we are madder than hell and we aren't going to take it anymore".

5/20/2009 10:55 PM  
Anonymous NAZI DETECTOR said...


5/20/2009 11:05 PM  
Anonymous LO said...

Thank you so much Blog Boy for hosting this blog. We are able to see patterns in discrimination and in retaliation by DIRt after whistleblowing on Goverment waste.

5/21/2009 8:17 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dean Fryer is robbing the State of California. The shear amount that Dean and his accomplices Jim Culbeaux and Christine Baker are robbing the State, are we surprised to be in a deficit? NO. NO. NO.

5/21/2009 9:26 PM  
Anonymous Civil Rights Act of 1962 observer said...

Rumor has it that the only two black females in the Santa Ana Office have been served with adverse actions and an investigative hearing for unauthorized emails while the asian and hispanic females go untouched. How do you spell discrimination? DIR

5/21/2009 10:53 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Vanessa Holton is having office sex while she deploys her spineless attorneys to discriminate against employees.

Make sure to name DIRt legal Unit in your lawsuits.

5/22/2009 10:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

To Bradstreet,
First, I congratulate Proposition 8 being uphold by California Supreme Court. Since you allow discrimination at work and do not enforce California labor laws, your marriage will not be allowed and enforced by Californian Voters and High Court. Don't feel bad now, because of what goes around come around. What a shame when you allowed Padres altered and withheld my evidence, etc. in order to protect a powerful politicians connecting employer and disregarded my basic right under State and Federal Constitution. So you and your partner don't blame the people and a High Court of California violating your basic right. Amen!

5/26/2009 11:07 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Jim Culbeaux the thief has been snooping on upper management emails for a long time.

5/27/2009 5:59 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dean Fryer your post 6/27/2009 6:09PM is not appreciated. This site is not for DIRt management. Go about your business robbing the California Taxpayers and selling Real Estate using State resources and time.

5/27/2009 7:03 PM  
Anonymous DIRt Office Sex said...

Oh Yeah, Jim Culbeaux has been reading and passing around Vanessa Holton's DIR office sex email dialogue with her then boss former DIR Director Lloyd Aubry.

5/27/2009 10:18 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Great victory for Prop 8. At last the judges have decided not to block the will of California voters.

This is a great incentive for Angela Bradstreet to move to another State where she can continue to whore herself to the private sector.

5/27/2009 11:47 PM  
Anonymous Whistleblower said...

Jim Culbeaux the criminal will get a telephone pole up his a-se when the Attorney General finds out about the Ponzi schemes he's been running out of DIRt. Payroll, overtime and travel expense fraud. Contractor kickbacks (such as Compucom )for hiring his family members (such as Michael Baker, Jim Culbeaux's nephew) in exchange for millions of dollars in DOSH contracts to Compucom.

FBI will have the handcuffs ready.

I'd love to see Jim when the (FBI) hurl him out of the building in handcuffs and he calls out "Christiiiiiiiiiine, help I did'nt do it." No skirt to hide under then!!!

Make sure Jim Culbeaux does not put his retard son Maxim on the DIR payroll at all cost.

5/28/2009 12:17 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Why do you guys in DLSE and IT Departments let the managers get away with criminal behavior. If each of you sabotages the system in whatever you do, the system (corrupt judicial system and judges) will take care of you. Thats how DIRt is stll in business inspite of all the whistleblowers who have sacrificed.

You should then go after the judges too. Criminals Reign!!!

You wonder why the world hates us?

Only in Amariicca!!!!!!!!!!!

5/28/2009 5:52 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...



5/28/2009 11:36 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dean Fryer you stalking the blogger now while you come to get screwed by Rick Rice in Southern Calif - taxpayer paid.

5/29/2009 6:02 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tony Mischel is a lousy trial lawyer. Put him in a trial room with a jury and he'll screw up the case. He doesn't have what it takes to be a trial lawyer. He does good in front of a judge but not in a courtroom with a jury.

5/30/2009 9:54 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

FYI. Jim Culbeaux is married to mail-order bride from Russia. She came to US as student at UC with help Jim Culbeaux. Then he marry her.

6/01/2009 5:03 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dean Fryer and Jim Culbeaux are thieves that are costing the State millions and driving us further into deficit.

6/01/2009 10:42 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anyone please post Vanessa Holton DIR office sex emails. I wanna puke tonite.

6/03/2009 7:49 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Criminal behavior is under California and US Constitutions? What's wrong when people speech the truth under US Constitution. There is always fire when there is smoke. If you do not like us to have freedom of speech, ask State and Federal High Courts to censor this blog. People's blog is for public interest and for the sake of taxpayers. Your dictatorship is criminal behavior. Are you afraid of public getting to know the truth? Are you afraid of the prosecution by FBI and Federal Justice Department? Remember, United States is a Democratic society.

6/04/2009 10:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This blog is also helping reveal retaliation/discrimination at DIR for whistleblowing and other protected class of employees.

It is helping reveal the fraud in the examination and hiring at DIRt.

Finally it helps reveal Dean Fryer, Jim Culbeaux, Christine Baker, and the other thieves robbing the system.

6/04/2009 10:40 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Toni Michelle can only suck up to other SPB judges - conveniently on the same floor in Los Angeles as his office.

Admin Law Judges, what a joke. ALJs are there to protect management, and unless their conduct is so overwhelmingly obvious-like having a video of Jorge Gomez saying "it's time to retaliate against {insert employee name here}-they will find every reason to support management's lawyers, despite evidence to the contrary.

ALJs have the same respect as DLSE Hearing Officers-ALJs aren't real judges and DLSE Hearing Officers aren't real lawyers.

6/08/2009 9:31 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Schwarzenegger said the state would be tightfisted in its financial crisis -- and beyond.

"With today's action, every state agency and department will scrutinize how every penny is spent on contracts to make sure the state is getting the best deal for every taxpayer dollar," Schwarzenegger said in a statement.

That muscle-brain has no clue how the attorneys at DIRt are being hired to clean the managers butts and slap diapers on them rather than fix the system of retaliation.

The blog-boy is a great example. The more time DIRt and its attorneys spend keeping the blog-boy away from work and retaliating against him the more DIR will have to pay the blog-boy.

But hey, its not coming out of Vanesa Holton's paycheck. Muscle brain has no clue how DIR Legal Unit is sucking out the taxpayers into a big black-hole.

6/08/2009 11:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

DIR is a sham. How can an agency that is violating every workers' law on the books be expected to protect workers???

6/09/2009 6:14 PM  
Blogger The BLOGGER, aka Blog Boy said...

All of you 'tards that use foul language will be deleted. You can use 'F*ck' instead of the F-bomb; don't you get it, or are you trying to reach beyond your 5th grade English skills?

Is my message any less clear by writing, "John Rea is an *sshole public servant," or were you able to comprehend what I tried to get across?

6/10/2009 8:19 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Chris, once there is movement on your lawsuit you might want to delve into the affairs and interaction of CASE Union members inre potential integrity issues. Whether it's incompetence or in bed with DIR management is of no consequence; their poor representation of members in past issues speaks for itself. Dig and deep kid and gfo get 'em.

1/22/2010 2:22 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Chris, O just reviewed the latest Harvard Law Journal. One law article on 1st Amendment freedom of speech in a lead opinion is by Justice Anthony Kennedy citing relevant precedents. You're on the money kid. The Supreme's majority doesn't like government muscling in on content speech. The morons representing your adversaries are malpracticing; Instead of settling hit them hard for absolutely largest dollars, and individually - Rupp and Nakagama - as well. Get the US Attorney aboard kid.

1/22/2010 2:30 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Abigail tempting a politician? I can see that. Nakagama temptng a politician? Some horny, horny hard up guy. An operator, a sneaky, deceptive, foul, criminal, divisive .... well that's the way the females of her species operate. I have seen it over and over again without exception; playing up to a false Hollywood cultivated image of a selfless dedicated Jappo female servant. That's also how they stay under the radar by playing up to a community's generosity and social goodwill. I think they call that "diversity" now days. Before he realizes it she's cut off the benevolent unsuspecting renaissance benefactor's nuts. Dumbronski Miller must have spent the post WWII years in Jappo land and experienced a community of a humble, grateful nation. He was obviously unaware a Gardena City brand of Jappo is different altogether. One Jappo female like Susan Nakagama will turn your company, agency department into a divided, unhappy, hostile work environment. The best thing this governor can do for the state of Cal is to intervene to cause a termination. Nakagama is an embarrassment. Abigail in comparison is an angel; I've had a couple of frank conversations with her and she seem to be a fine lady. I don't know much about the pending legal issues involving Abigail with Chris, and Gomez. I think a lot of what Chris has gone through originated with Nakagama when Chris started working in BOFE. Chris and Rosen I think you should consider Susan Nakagama as an indiv. deft. in your lawsuit as a swap out of Abigail Calva. (I am not Abigail).

2/14/2010 7:10 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home