Governor Steroid is clueless as he was faithful....more $$$ DLSE/DIRt fraud, waste, and abuse
Gov. Idiot says he wants every agency to scrutinize every penny spent. Does Susan Kennedy look the other way just because her rainbow flag counterpart, Labor Commissioner Angela Badstreet will waste any & all money necessary to try and win their termination against the Blogger?These idiots are flying out Brian Davenport, at TAXPAYER EXPENSE-from Missouri to Los Angeles, to testify that the Blogger made a command decision based on no policy, procedure, or practice-despite numerous requests for such policies & procedures. Furthermore, Davenport was made entirely whole because Jorge Gomez gave him a new conference-even though Davenport didn't deserve a new conference because he failed to appear at his initial conference-but Rosen will spend all day hitting them in the ass with that...I cannot wait!DLSE lawyer
posted by Author at
8:21 AM
35 Comments:
Has anyone read Executive order S-09-09?
http://gov.ca.gov/executive-order/12460/
Wonder how DIRt is paying for the plane ticket, because reading this order makes it seem like state agencies can't spend any unallocated $$$ at all because CA is broke! Has the Bureau of State Audits ever looked at DIRt's accounting? They probably hide or misclassify all of their dirty expenses. We have furloughs (translation: pay cuts) but DIRt is spending $$ flying out a loser who failed to appear for his own hearing?? How was he wronged, since he was then given a hearing? How many other citizens are accommodated in this way? Only those that complain against an employee that DIRt had in their sight?
If DIRt settles with the blogger, where would they find the $$?
Bad times in CA.
At this point I predict that at the very least the blogger will get 10 million for all the Sh+t DIRt put him through.
Jim Culbeaux and his sister Christine Baker continue to rob the taxpayers. When will they be thrown in jail?
DIRt can fight because it's not their money. Tony Mischel doesn't know the Labor Code because he's only a Human Resources tool to keep DLSE employees in their place.
Wouldn't it be great to depose Tony Mischel and force him to disclose the last time DIRt assigned him a labor code-related case?
Same thing with Powder...errrr, I mean Steve McSquinty. Personally, I would love Lloyd Aubrey and Vanessa Holton deposed and get to the bottom of their employment-related affairs, divorces, and sex-for-promotions that even cancer cannot cure.
Blogger ain't gonna get $10,000,000....but it should would be nice to put a lien on Jorge Gomez's house after he's personally liable for doing DLSE's illegal dirty work.
The blogger won't get squat cuz he's a loser!!! Here's a tip- why not try to get a job at Burger King, Starbucks or Walmart? That's about your speed.
Is the photo next to this post actually the blogger?Looks just like him.
Dean Fryer is sure getting worked up (see the last two comments.) After settlement of the case with the blogger won't be money left for Dean to charge DIRt for his rides from SF to So.Cal to make love with Rick Rice as re-payment for the promotion Dean was given by Rick.
Read headlines:
"Judge: Ex-Bush lawyer can be sued over torture.
A prisoner who says he was tortured while being held for nearly four years as a suspected terrorist can sue former Bush administration lawyer John Yoo for coming up with the legal theories that justified his alleged treatment."
-- If this is true I do not see why the blogger should not be able to sue DIRt lawyers individually for his retaliation. It is very very very clear to all that Vanessa Holton, Tony Mischel, Steve McGinty crafted up guidelines on how the blogger was treated.
That thief Jim Culbeaux and his sister Christine Baker is still robbing the State of California while we run into this deficit.
It is people like the blogger boy that save the State billions by keeping a check the fraud that is happening at DLSE/DIRt.
Now it is time to reward the blogger for his retaliation and for all he has sacrificed.
Was it really worth it?
Hello,
I saw Vanessa Holton's couch. She used it for sex with Lloyd Aubry while the staff worked outside. Sick...
Speaking of DLSE's incompetence, ineptness & insolvency, Blog Boy, you must have episodes where deputy commissioners purposely sabotage cases for either the employers or ex-employees. I know this goes on all the time as my experience illustrates.
I have an active appeal going on with Commissioner Bradstreet to investigate a hearing officer, Jean Murphy, who accepted prima facie fraudulent evidence as factual evidence for the employer. When I initially attempted to provide evidence at the hearing that it was fraudulent, Murphy interrupted me and told me I could only present evidence of fraud at a criminal court and not at a civil hearing! Apparently she thinks employees are so dumb, we will believe anything. Murphy also denied a subpoena order that the DLSE drew up on a completely false basis that was critical evidence that would have substantiated all my claims. In fact, Murphy made that ruling before she was able to look at the document because the subpoena hadn’t yet reached her bench, as if there was some pre-agreement between Murphy and the employer’s lawyer to deny this subpoena order beforehand. In her decision, Murphy then fabricated the testimony of the employer, reinvented the evidence of this employer and presented the fraudulent evidence as factual evidence that I was able to prove during the hearing as completely fraudulent.
The labor Commissioner assigned this investigator, Regional Manager Mauldin, who whitewashed this hearing officer’s gross misconduct and refused to address the evidence I presented supporting my allegations of Murphy’s corruption. I’ll quote from this investigator in regard to the subpoena order, “[W]e cannot enforce the subpoena if the party does not comply.” Neither the employer nor their lawyer ever stated that they wouldn’t comply with the order at the hearing and is categorically a gross misstatement because not to comply with a subpoena order is in fact a criminal act as stated in California Labor Code Section 93!
I contended to Commissioner Bradstreet that this was a whitewash and there was no evidence that in fact the investigator ever listened to the hearing tapes and other evidence as she stated she had.
I could go on and on and on about the corruption and dishonesty of the DLSE as I experienced it. It is obvious to me that the DLSE has no respect for due process or the labor laws. Senior Deputy Banagas even held up the employer’s check intended for me because I had complained about this hearing officer! I could hear laughing in the background when Banagas then conferred to me that they had given my complaint to a furloughed officer! What a confederacy of lamebrains!
Blog boy, if you have other stories of DLSE corruption you would be doing us a great public service and the disclosure by people like me who have been through this ringer a cathartic and redemptive justification for their outrage at this bogus labor commission.
Humbarger, if you were half as smart as you think you are, you'd know that the appeal of a labor commissioner's order decision or award is accomplished by filing an appeal in superior court for a trial de novo. Get a clue.
Dear brave Mr. or Ms. Anonymous or is that your real name? I’m not afraid to tell you mine or shy away from an issue incognito. I stated what my appeal was for and that was to have Bradstreet investigate this hearing officer. My appeal was strictly in terms of the integrity of this state agency where I was trying to expose corruption. I never stated I was appealing my case at this hearing per se and I also stated that I had a check withheld from my ex-employer, which because I exposed this senior deputy, she was forced to give me. This definitely implies that my case, as you should know, had ended. That is what I stated and I will stick by it.
You, on the other hand, come off like Yosemite Sam jumping to all kinds of unwarranted, sarcastic conclusions. If this blogger allows it, I will give you or anyone else, Regional Manager Mauldin DLSE whitewashed response by contacting this email address: heliocen@hotmail.com. Then if you are man or woman enough, you can have the opportunity to apologize to me and give what I stated the credibility it deserves. Fair enough?
Karl you may have noiced that this website exists because DLSE and DIRt do not follow the law. And, yet they are entrusted to enforce the law.
Commissioner Angela Bradstreet is here to collect a paycheck, flirt with, hire and promote lesbians. And she cares a f#ck about your case. I have only one word for them -- Parasites.
I am sure you are not the only agency in this dilemma. You need to join forces to close DLSE and DIRt down and help California taxpayers get rid of these parasites.
It's got nothing to do with bravery. Did it ever occur to you that some posts are anonymous because the poster may be dlse employee who knows that if they use their name they're toast. It's called common sense. dlse is no different than any other organization, there are competent employees and incompetent ones. I do wish you the best. I just think its unfair for you to label a whole agency as being corrupt. Some of us work very hard and are 100% dedicated to being fair.
OK, don’t give me your names. (I just don’t like being blind-sided by cheap shots from people in chat rooms and now bloggers who read what I’ve thoughtfully written as a Rorschach test for expressing their infantile rage.)
I’m a thousand times more interested in actions though than words. Here’s a brief litany of named DLSE officials and their actions since my cases were opened in June 2006.
Deputy Commissioner McGaha, who told me other officials wanted her to close my case, allowed a conference, where I convinced her that this employer was lying about the evidence. But though I had submitted extremely obvious proof that the employer’s case was based on fraudulent evidence, DC McGaha sat on that evidence for two years until she was either fired or retired. Plus my 2802 mileage complaint under her charge was never put in the DLSE database. There was no record that I had filed it.
DC Lazaro, in my retaliation case, was totally convinced of the fraudulent evidence in the one meeting we had, also sat on the case until she was fired as DLSE officer Stephanie Baker blithely informed me in 9/08. Baker tried to convince me to drop my retaliation case. It took me about 1 minute to figure out that she knew nothing about the case. This was her apparent modus operandi to cut down her workload.
Senior DC Joan Healy also wouldn’t acknowledge my 2802 mileage complaint, though I brought it up again and again. Finally in 9/08 I went down to the San Jose DLSE and asked to view my files and on top of the files was sitting this complaint. I asked to see Senior DC Joan Healy. She insisted that I take it back. I said fine, I’ll take it back. But knowing the statutes of limitations was not passed, I informed her I’d file another one that was updated. Senior DC Joan Healy literally had a hissy fit and kept insisting over and over again not to file this 2802 complaint. Well, I filed another one on 10/1/08. I insisted that the San Jose DLSE file it and put it in their database right then and there. They refused and told me that they wouldn’t do it unless Senior DC Benagas personally approved it. I kept calling back on weekly bases for 6 weeks and again and again it wasn’t in the DLSE database. Only when I complained to the SF DLSE offices did they finally file it and it was included at the hearing. The rest of this sorry debacle is in my last blog.
I find it hard to believe that Anonymous II does not know this kind of routine corruption is going on. I applaud this blogger for his attempts to expose the antics of this labor commission, but hurling insults like Gulliver’s yahoos may be immediately gratifying, the real fight is won on the inside with real names and cases. Hey, don’t give your names, but be brave enough to expose these hypocrites and liars with specific cases and actions. People like this blogger I believe would love to do the rest. And I would love to assist in any way I can.
If it was not for this blog, a few parasites at DIRt would have been dead by now!
To Bradstreet,
First, I congratulate Proposition 8 being uphold by California Supreme Court. Since you allow discrimination and retaliation at work and do not enforce California labor laws, your marriage will not be allowed and enforced by Californian Voters and High Court. Don't feel bad now, because of what goes around comes around. What a shame when you allowed Padres altered and withheld my evidence, etc. in order to protect a powerful politicians(Republican and the Governor) well connecting employer and disregarded my basic right"due process" under State and Federal Constitutions. So you and your partner don't blame the people and a High Court of California violating your basic right. I wish someday FBI and Federal Justice Deparment will come after each one of you just for the sake of the taxpayers and powerless employees. Amen!
Dean Fryer from your post directly above this it is obvious that management is frying your bacon butt and pressuring you to post garbage here to justify your high salary.
Dean Fryer is a sick thief. He has robbed his un-suspecting real estate customers for years. Now he is also robbing the State of California. Who's next?
Jim Culbeaux / Christine Baker, what a team of thieves.
This blog has revealed fraud, waste & abuse in the DIRt!! Now, more than ever, government operations are under public scrutiny. The blogger started revealing the bull sh*t this agency does long before it became the focus of the public and mainstream media. This agency has got to be one of the biggest abusers of public funds.
If the labor commissioner suggests the employee to suit at the court and she does not want to enforce California labor laws, I suggest DLSE should be shut down in order to save a lot of money from California State Budget for the sake of the taxpayers. If the employee can directly file a lawsuit at the court, why should taxpayers need DLSE. Lawmakers should spend taxpayer's money on other program or somewhere else.
Only the world racist and sexist hired only women, lesbians, bi-sexual females, and non-minorities for the top level positions at DLSE. This is why powerless employee's basic right "due process" has been violated at DLSE. Federal Justice Department and FBI should start to investigate DLSE for the sake of the taxpayers and powerless employees. Amen!
Another undeserving pet, Karen Denise Ramos.
Hey, Arnold call ICE down on DIR and scrub from top to bottom. It could save scarce public dollars by eliminating illegal aliens on state payroll. It's not just their status but their violation of oath of office and corruption. To avoid conlaw issues invest. all from top to bottom rung.
Hey 6/24/2009 pardon but from the working class deputy perspective it's some, but not all, of the "minorities" at the mid and regional level management that are causing probs. at DIR. It's the affirmative action lawsuits that have turned the world upside down, i.e., Alice in Wonderland. Hey, I am not white but nevertheless, again some but not all, of Mex, VC, Chinese have proved to be incapable managers at this time. The entire DIR needs to be scrubbed clean. Let CL give it a go. It can't get any worse, could it?
... correction ... former DLC inre above ...
Checked cholo Jorge for mex-citizenship? It was a given for his generation to payoff for US birth papers when they were actually born south of the Rio Grande. He may not need his US residence after all, if he is one of those. Hey esse man scan a copy of our birth cert. for verify. Be the first to get deported amigo.
fyi, we're seeing more mexicans with fake/forged AZ driver licenses in retail activity in no. county San Diego. Significant increase may be per AZ state constitution change inre immigration bill signed by its gov. The ones with gangster tattoos ask for cheaper brands of 22 caliber ammo. When purchase is refused lo and behold their behavior betrays their gangster affiliation. Cal. may see influx from the AZ state unless its legislature steps up to take appropriate action. It's now clear many but not all past DIR claims have been fraudulent; they're such great actors. Even the most pragmatic of us have let our sympathetic paradigms dictate our judgment. Misapplied affirmative action has brought incompetent managers at DIR. Let them go elsewhere; like Illinois for instance.
Certain elected pol's from Illinois have criticized AZ legislation recently signed by its gov. They have not seen the increased econ. and social costs of crime, fraud, welfare, bilingual education, health, sanitation, affirmative action .. when illegal alien mexicans arrive by the busload, by the carload, by the trainload, by the planeload, by the truckload to trash entire portions of cities. It's criminal behavior, parasitic economic costs, entitlement spoiled adults.
It's not your race but it's your corruption and your crimes. Get the hell out of our communities and workplaces.
Yes the Labor Board Comissioner in Santa Ana let my employer get away with non payment of overtime and other code violations. They had six months to investigate and the only thing they did was schedule a 5 minute formal conference(which was a complete joke by the way). 2 months later my employer filed for chapter 11. I reopened the case after the dismissal of the BK and got a judgment for $26,000 from the labor board that I cannot collect becuase my former employer has no "assets" (yet he is still operating the same business and driving around in a Ferrari). How is this fair? If the labor board would of done their job and enforced the law, I could have collected my overtime wages and my last pay check. We the Tax payers have to suffer and be treated so rudely by these people who are not at all protecting employees!
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home