Friday, September 15, 2006

Current re-cap of DLSE failures in the last few weeks dealing with only one blogger:


DLSE wanted to interrogate blogger without blogger's attorney present:
Round One to BLOGGER.
DLSE wanted to inspect personal diaries and journals of blogger:
Round Two to BLOGGER.
DLSE thought temporary injunction 'expired' when court granted their judge change-up:
Round Three to BLOGGER
.
DLSE filed Demurrer to throw out blogger's Preliminary Injunction:
Round Four to BLOGGER
.
DLSE wanted to interrogate blogger about contents of blog:
Round Five to BLOGGER
.
DLSE wanted Blogger to disclose sources of blogger's information:
Round Six to BLOGGER.
Here's a hint, morons: stop trying to destroy the US Constitution and maybe you'll stop losing so much. Either try a different tact like doing actual work for the Division or find a job digging a ditch.

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

DIR:

Blogger is a self-made public figure. His behavior leads to the following questions.

Who paid for blogger's litigation fees and expenses?

Blogger declare fees in tax filings?

Blogger severed from US Border Patrol employment? Racist, sadist, criminal, mentally ill or harasser?

Blogger's psychiatric mental health file?

Blogger have a sealed or dismissed criminal history?

Personnel and the public have a right to know. Management has a duty to discover and take corrective action.

4/19/2008 1:51 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home